During an audit engagement, the internal auditor discussed a risk mitigation recommendation with the manager of the area under review. The manager disagreed with the risk assessment and recommendation. The two failed to come up with an alternative solution, and the auditor decided to proceed with including the original recommendation in the engagement report. Which of the following is especially important in dealing with this type of situation?
As a matter of policy, the chief audit executive routinely rotates internal audit staff assignments and periodically interviews the staff to discuss the potential for conflicts of interest. These actions help fulfill which of the following internal audit mandates?
According to IIA guidance, which of the following must internal auditors consider to conform with the requirements for due professional care during a consulting engagement?
1. The cost of the engagement, as it pertains to audit time and expenses in relation to the potential benefits.
2. The needs and expectation of clients, including the nature, timing, and communication of engagement results.
3. The application of technology-based audit and other data analysis techniques, where appropriate.
4. The relative complexity and extent of work needed to achieve the engagement's objectives.