Free OACETT IEPPE Exam Questions
Try our Free Demo Practice Tests for Comprehensive IEPPE Exam Preparation
-
OACETT IEPPE Exam Questions
-
Provided By: OACETT
- Exam: Internationally Educated Professional Practice Exam
- Certification: CET Certification
-
Total Questions: 132
-
Updated On: Jun 04, 2025
-
Rated: 4.9 |
-
Online Users: 264
-
Question 1
-
When was the first OACETT Act given royal assent?
Answer: A
-
When was the first OACETT Act given royal assent?
-
Question 2
-
Which one of the following remedies is available to a plaintiff in a civil law case?
Answer: C
-
Which one of the following remedies is available to a plaintiff in a civil law case?
-
Question 3
-
What organization is responsible for regulating and advocating for public safety with respect to the use
of electricity in Ontario?
Answer: C
-
What organization is responsible for regulating and advocating for public safety with respect to the use
of electricity in Ontario?
-
Question 4
-
What is non est factum or ‘it is not my act because my mind did not go with my pen’?
Answer: D
-
What is non est factum or ‘it is not my act because my mind did not go with my pen’?
-
Question 5
-
Mike is an OACETT C. Tech. He works for a municipal government in their infrastructure
department. He is responsible for designing and approving the sewage and water management systems
in new residential developments. Mike is currently revising the design for the sewage and water
management system for a development that is six months behind schedule due to a series of worker and
materials shortages. The developer is also experiencing severe financial pressures, as a result of cost
over runs caused by the shortages. As he is revising the sewage and water management system designs,
Mike notices a flaw in the water catchment system built around a small lake that is a key selling feature
of the residential development. The design flaw means that, while the relevant standards are still met,
in severe rainfall events the catchment system will be very susceptible to flooding. The flooding may in
turn make the area dangerous for the residents using the park and recreational area around the lake.
Mike brings this design flaw to the attention of his manager. His manager then schedules a meeting
with the developer to discuss the design flaw. The developer indicates that the design cannot be changed
due to budget constraints and existing commitments to the present design. Mike’s manager then
communicates this to Mike. He directs Mike to stamp the designs. What should Mike do in this
situation?
If Mike chooses to stamp the designs, what could one possible consequence be for him professionally
given the professional practice issue in the situation?
Answer: B
-
Mike is an OACETT C. Tech. He works for a municipal government in their infrastructure
department. He is responsible for designing and approving the sewage and water management systems
in new residential developments. Mike is currently revising the design for the sewage and water
management system for a development that is six months behind schedule due to a series of worker and
materials shortages. The developer is also experiencing severe financial pressures, as a result of cost
over runs caused by the shortages. As he is revising the sewage and water management system designs,
Mike notices a flaw in the water catchment system built around a small lake that is a key selling feature
of the residential development. The design flaw means that, while the relevant standards are still met,
in severe rainfall events the catchment system will be very susceptible to flooding. The flooding may in
turn make the area dangerous for the residents using the park and recreational area around the lake.
Mike brings this design flaw to the attention of his manager. His manager then schedules a meeting
with the developer to discuss the design flaw. The developer indicates that the design cannot be changed
due to budget constraints and existing commitments to the present design. Mike’s manager then
communicates this to Mike. He directs Mike to stamp the designs. What should Mike do in this
situation?
If Mike chooses to stamp the designs, what could one possible consequence be for him professionally
given the professional practice issue in the situation?