Garrison Investments is a money management firm focusing on endowment management for small colleges
and universities. Over the past 20 years, the firm has primarily invested in U.S. securities with small allocations
to high quality long-term foreign government bonds. Garrison's largest account, Point University, has a market
value of $800 million and an asset allocation as detailed in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Point University Asset Allocation
*Bond coupon payments are all semiannual.
Managers at Garrison are concerned that expectations for a strengthening U.S. dollar relative to the British
pound could negatively impact returns to Point University's U.K. bond allocation. Therefore, managers have
collected information on swap and exchange rates. Currently, the swap rates in the United States and the
United Kingdom are 4.9% and 5.3%, respectively. The spot exchange rate is 0.45 GBP/USD. The U.K. bonds
are currently trading at face value.
Garrison recently convinced the board of trustees at Point University that the endowment should allocate a
portion of the portfolio into international equities, specifically European equities. The board has agreed to the
plan but wants the allocation to international equities to be a short-term tactical move. Managers at Garrison
have put together the following proposal for the reallocation:
To minimize trading costs while gaining exposure to international equities, the portfolio can use futures
contracts on the domestic 12-month mid-cap equity index and on the 12-month European equity index. This
strategy will temporarily exchange $80 million of U.S. mid-cap exposure for European equity index exposure.
Relevant data on the futures contracts are provided in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Mid-cap index and European Index Futures Data
Three months after proposing the international diversification plan, Garrison was able to persuade Point
University to make a direct short-term investment of $2 million in Haikuza Incorporated (HI), a Japanese
electronics firm. HI exports its products primarily to the United States and Europe, selling only 30% of its
production in Japan. In order to control the costs of its production inputs, HI uses currency futures to mitigate
exchange rate fluctuations associated with contractual gold purchases from Australia. In its current contract, HI
has one remaining purchase of Australian gold that will occur in nine months. The company has hedged the
purchase with a long 12-month futures contract on the Australian dollar (AUD).
Managers at Garrison are expecting to sell the HI position in one year, but have become nervous about the
impact of an expected depreciation in the value of the Yen relative to the U.S. dollar. Thus, they have decided
to use a currency futures hedge. Analysts at Garrison have estimated that the covariance between the local
currency returns on HI and changes in the USD/Yen spot rate is -0.184 and that the variance of changes in the
USD/Yen spot rate is 0.92.
Which of the following best describes the minimum variance hedge ratio for Garrison's currency futures hedge
Robert Keith, CFA, has begun a new job at CMT Investments as Head of Compliance. Keith has just completed
a review of all of CMT's operations, and has interviewed all the firm's portfolio managers. Many are CFA
charterholders, but some are not. Keith intends to use the CFA Institute Code and Standards, as well as the
Asset Manager Code of Professional Conduct, as ethical guidelines for CMT to follow.
In the course of Keith's review of the firm's overall practices, he has noted a few situations which potentially
need to be addressed.
Situation 1:
CMT Investments' policy regarding acceptance of gifts and entertainment is not entirely clear. There is general
confusion within the firm regarding what is and is not acceptable practice regarding gifts, entertainment and
additional compensation.
Situation 2:
Keith sees inconsistency regarding fee disclosures to clients. In some cases, information related to fees paid to
investment managers for investment services provided are properly disclosed. However, a few of the periodic
costs, which will affect investment return, are not disclosed to the clients. Most managers are providing clients
with investment returns net of fees, but a few are just providing the gross returns. One of the managers stated
"providing gross returns is acceptable, as long as I show the fees such that the client can make their own
simple calculation of the returns net of fees."
Situation 3:
Keith has noticed a few gaps in CMT's procedure regarding use of soft dollars. There have been cases where
"directed brokerage" has resulted in less than prompt execution of trades. He also found a few cases where a
manager paid a higher commission than normal, in order to obtain goods or services. Keith is considering
adding two statements to CMT's policy and procedures manual specifically addressing the primary issues he
noted.
Statement 1:
"Commissions paid, and any corresponding benefits received, are the property of the client. The benefit(s) must
directly benefit the client. If a manager's client directs the manager to purchase goods or services that do not
provide research services that benefit the client, this violates the duty of loyalty to the client.”
Statement 2:
"In cases of "directed brokerage," if there is concern that the client is not receiving the best execution, it is
acceptable to utilize a less than ideal broker, but it must be disclosed to the client that they may not be obtaining
the best execution."
Situation 4:
Keith is still evaluating his data, but it appears that there may be situations where proxies were not voted. After
completing his analysis of proxy voting procedures at CMT, Keith wants to insert the proper language into the
procedures manual to address proxy voting.
Situation 5:
Keith is putting into place a "disaster recovery- plan," in order to ensure business continuity in the event of a
localized disaster, and also to protect against any type of disruption in the financial markets. This plan includes
the following provisions:
• Procedures for communicating with clients, especially in the event of extended disruption of services provided.
• Alternate arrangement for monitoring and analyzing investments in the event that primary systems become
unavailable.
• Plans for internal communication and coverage of crucial business functions in the event of disruption at the
primary place of business, or a communications breakdown.
Keith is considering adding the following provisions to the disaster recovery plan in order to properly comply
with the CFA Institute Asset Manager Code of Professional Conduct:
Provision 1: "A provision needs to be added incorporating off-site backup for all pertinent account information."
Provision 2: "A provision mandating testing of the plan on a company-wide basis, at periodical intervals, should
be added."
Situation 6:
Keith is spending an incredible amount of time on detailed procedures and company policies that are in
compliance with the CFA Institute Code and Standards, and also in compliance with the CFA Institute Asset
Manager Code of Professional Conduct. As part of this process, he has had several meetings with CMT senior
management, and is second-guessing the process. One of the senior managers is indicating that it might be a
better idea to just formally adopt both the Code and Standards and the Asset Manager Code of Conduct, which
would make a detailed policy and procedure manual redundant.
Keith wants to assure CMT's compliance with the requirements of the CFA Institute Code and Standards of
Professional Conduct. Which of the following statements most accurately describes CMT's responsibilities in
order to assure compliance?